 |
|
| Hello, you are currently browsing to Retro-Renault Archive which is a copy of our old forum. You cannot post replies in this forum. Please click here to go to the active website.
|
| Poll :: whaich is best, the 19 16v or clio 16v? |
| 19 16v |
|
68% |
[ 17 ] |
| clio 16v |
|
32% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 25 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:19 pm |
|
19 has less room at the rear of the engine by a long way compared to the clio, the clio has less room everywhere else though! |
|
|
|
|
bidderman1969
Retroholic
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1000
|
| Posted:
Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:51 pm |
|
i always thought the ph1 looks a proper racer dirived car, for a racing Renault, has a haunched look about it |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:24 pm |
|
ph1 is the more raw car.
The ph2 is a nice car and it looks pretty and is very comfy.
The ph1's features like the brake cooling ducts, large front air dam, deep skirts and low rear bumper are all aids to make it look and behave like it means business.
Then they ruined 90% of them with electric sunroofs.
The only feature the clio 16V has over the non 16V models are flared arches and a bonnet bulge and vent. |
|
|
|
|
bidderman1969
Retroholic
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1000
|
| Posted:
Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:26 pm |
|
i still prefer ph1's over 2's......... |
|
|
|
|
bidderman1969
Retroholic
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1000
|
| Posted:
Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:20 am |
|
so have all the votes been cast, counted and verified??????????????? |
|
|
|
|
Clio 16valver
Level 4 User
Joined: 03 Jun 2006
Posts: 83
|
| Posted:
Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:42 pm |
|
Ah bugger...i lost then!  |
|
|
|
|
bidderman1969
Retroholic
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 1000
|
| Posted:
Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:01 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
