| Author |
Message |
BenR
Level 5 User
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 114
|
| Posted:
Wed Mar 16, 2005 7:44 pm |
|
| stan wrote: |
| Chris H wrote: |
.
Ben's suggestion of use the crank and pistons in the 1.8 is the most technically correct.
|
But Chets is more unique. And in my opinion no less technical.
Chet u getting the crank lightened? |
????
running the pistons upside down is also unique.  |
|
|
|
|
stan
Gay Rights Activist
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1268
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:26 am |
|
u know wot (I mean what really) i mean |
|
|
|
|
stan
Gay Rights Activist
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1268
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:28 am |
|
Chet...
cos ur running lighter pistons, it would mean the crank webs could be made lighter. chances are they will be out of balance with respect to the piston/rod assembly (due to the now lighter pistons) |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:50 am |
|
stan you don't need to worry about that, exhaust paste stuck on will do the job to balance it |
|
|
|
|
stan
Gay Rights Activist
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1268
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:56 am |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:18 am |
|
never mind, Chet and everyone else will get it. |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:18 pm |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:16 am |
|
why I bother, me no speaka da anglais |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:58 pm |
|
Further stripping of the 3R shows it has no provisions for the oil sprays.
Gonna run with the 1.8 block |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
| Posted:
Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
