|
|
Hello, you are currently browsing to Retro-Renault Archive which is a copy of our old forum. You cannot post replies in this forum. Please click here to go to the active website.
|
Author |
Message |
Dan
Site Subscriber
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3547
|
Posted:
Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:48 am |
|
Chris H wrote: |
get the rods close, they don't have to be exact as they can be sorted.
make sure they are true though |
Yea the ones in the ph2 lump are fine as are the other 3 on the ph1, i dont know what caused it to bend in the 1st place.
When i rebuilt the head i did not that piston4 was lower than all the others by 1-3mm asked me dad and he said it would be fine.
but when it ran, no rattles or anythiing, which made me wonder why it siezed on idle. |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Mon Dec 26, 2005 3:26 am |
|
the one lower is not fine, that is a major issue.
I am clearing otu the sdheds lookign for bits to sort this ph2 out, I uncovered project M's bottom end, the one that ran then siezed then ran when cooled off, also it knocked a6t higher revs. Well piston number 2 is about 1mm lower than the 3 and when running it will go 1mm higher.
So the bigs ends away on that.
I will eventually get that stripped down for a hgander but not today.
i havce got pics will put em up in a wee while. |
|
|
|
|
Dan
Site Subscriber
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3547
|
Posted:
Mon Dec 26, 2005 3:48 am |
|
yea that was the ph1 engine that the piston was lower, and thats the bent conrod i showed a while back. The con rod was bent and oil starvation piston no.4, but it was bent when i stuck the head on the 1st time.but i cant find out why it bent in the 1st place. |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:05 am |
|
hydro locked at some point is the most obvious scenario. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |