| Author |
Message |
Gentle Ben
Site Subscriber
Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 2281
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:50 pm |
|
|
|
|
Neal
Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:03 pm |
|
I would have thought that would appeal to you actually Ben  |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:05 pm |
|
oh dear what ???
thats what you were gonna end up with if some clever members of rr did not change your mind about the 16v conversion
 |
|
|
|
|
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:11 pm |
|
second time i've seen that 19 on ebay in 4 months.
that car used to belong to a guy just up the road from me in Essex.
the body kit is not really a one off either, it's from prima racing
F2 front and rear bumper but the ebay one looks to have a slightly modded f2 front bumper, spoiler is from prima racing too. |
|
|
|
|
Gentle Ben
Site Subscriber
Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 2281
|
| Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:34 pm |
|
Fair play to him, the workmanship looks good but what I'm planning to do will augment what's already good about the car's looks.
I ain't planning to go too OTT with the bodywork and as for the engine conversion well.....that's up in the air at the minute.
Funnily enough though I have got my eye on something at the minute, just waiting to sort out the fundage and maybe by this time next week I'll have a new motor!
But don't hold your breath - I ain't! |
|
|
|
|
Addie
Site Subscriber
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 1141
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am |
|
Standard PH1 R19 16v front bumper would look much better.
Bit of a cheeky one tho, reg'd as a 1.4 but is actually a 1.8 ! |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:57 am |
|
it says a 1.4 in the item description and got a 16v engine under the bonnet  |
|
|
|
|
Doc
Site Subscriber
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 2929
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:32 am |
|
He says its down to the owner to declare the change to DVLA? Well he's the fucking owner at the moment.(DICK!)
It's people like him that force our insurance premiums up each year when they have a crash and find out there not covered by their insurance!
PEOPLE LIKE HIM SHOULD BE FUCKING SHOT!!!!!!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:41 am |
|
ferk off.
I have had a few cars where the engine capacity has gone from 1l up to 3.5 but never said anything to anyone about it.
No point in being up tight about it.
Its like people that say I have a 2 litre, well I have a 980cc with 248 bhp WHOPPEEWOO! |
|
|
|
|
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:43 am |
|
yes but accdent happens..
they inspect car.
and... |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:44 am |
|
yuo don;t get a payout. The insurance is void on the car but whatever you hit etc is still covered. |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:45 am |
|
are you sure about that chris ? that does not make much sense to be honest especially if you are talking about insurance companies here mate |
|
|
|
|
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:46 am |
|
hmm..
williams RT conversion here i come!
hehe |
|
|
|
|
Doc
Site Subscriber
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 2929
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:47 am |
|
So does that mean They'd be driving without valid insurance or not Chris? |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:49 am |
|
invalid but you have 3rd party cover
this is how i have been led to belive it.
seen a few cases where its been brought up in the courts |
|
|
|
|
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:49 am |
|
wont the driver with the uprated motor still get convicted?
or something or another |
|
|
|
|
Doc
Site Subscriber
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 2929
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:54 am |
|
My interpritation is that if your insurance is invalid then you are in effect driving without any. Thus you can be charged with driving without valid insurance.
Happens to my guys all the time.
However I'm not a lawer nor a police man so I could be wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:56 am |
|
might be different under scots law but they are in effect insured only 3rd party even though paying a fully comp policy due to incorrect vehicle details. |
|
|
|
|
Doc
Site Subscriber
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 2929
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:02 am |
|
| Quote: |
| might be different under scots law but they are in effect insured only 3rd party even though paying a fully comp policy due to incorrect vehicle details. |
Would be good if that was the case. Seems a lot more sensable then letting insurance companies screw the 3rd party. |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:06 pm |
|
can you possibly feck the fully comp and tft and just get the car insured for 3rd party and fire than ???????
i am trying to find a wway out of fitting an alarm you see  |
|
|
|
|
Doc
Site Subscriber
Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 2929
|
| Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2005 3:28 pm |
|
I don't think thats an option mate.
have you got an alarm to fit?
if not I've got a spare Cat 2 Toad imobiliser if you need it?
or are you just trying to find a way out of having to fit anything? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
