| Author |
Message |
simonds1
Site Subscriber
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 1108
|
| Posted:
Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:14 pm |
|
|
|
|
Dan
Site Subscriber
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 3547
|
| Posted:
Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:54 pm |
|
149.95!!!! im happy doing the noise myself, and chris h to make a chipmo... i mean wastegate chattering sound  |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:09 am |
|
hey! Soneji and Alan will tell yuo my wastegate chatter noise is very realistic! Just like my dump valve noise. |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:39 am |
|
I like the way they put it across as if people spend thousands on a turbo conversion just to get the dumpvalve noise. |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 21, 2005 6:57 am |
|
| Jonnyboy wrote: |
| I like the way they put it across as if people spend thousands on a turbo conversion just to get the dumpvalve noise. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Benskett
Level 10 User
Joined: 05 Mar 2005
Posts: 570
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:41 am |
|
Turbo 5 door R19 ........ Homer simpson Drewl!!!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:50 am |
|
| Benskett wrote: |
| Turbo 5 door R19 ........ Homer simpson Drewl!!!!! |
why its a shit engine?
16V is superior in every way. |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:21 pm |
|
yeah ph1 16v s are far too superior |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
| Posted:
Wed Jun 22, 2005 2:57 am |
|
do u not think he meant turbo'ing a 5-door 19 16v? |
|
|
|
|
simonds1
Site Subscriber
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 1108
|
| Posted:
Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:45 am |
|
Yeah, that's how I read it lol, a turbo R19 with 5 doors........not a renault 5 turbo engine in a R19  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
