Author |
Message |
domn8
Level 6 User
Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
|
Posted:
Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:03 am |
|
Looking for the above Gmax/Spax or other for Clio valver, with shocks considered. Dom |
|
|
|
|
domn8
Level 6 User
Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:19 am |
|
come on you know you want to sell some to me |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 01, 2005 6:02 am |
|
i would love to sell you some mate, but i just aint got any! |
|
|
|
|
Rich1
Level 7 User
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 224
|
Posted:
Mon Aug 01, 2005 4:03 pm |
|
got some GSF one brand new (not even covered a mile!) £30+ Post if ur interested? |
|
|
|
|
domn8
Level 6 User
Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
|
Posted:
Tue Aug 02, 2005 5:05 am |
|
Are they made for GSF by a recognised brand or just a GSF only job?
Why havent you fitted them if you dont mind me asking as I keep getting different views on lowering my Clio
Dom |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Tue Aug 02, 2005 6:33 am |
|
a clio 16V handles best on stock shocks and springs.
GSF springs are mabe by ventura or something, they are a known brand. |
|
|
|
|
Rich1
Level 7 User
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 224
|
Posted:
Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:56 am |
|
just not fitted them cos they were gonna be for the 1.2 when i did the valver brakes but i didnt need to change the hubs and dampers so didnt need the springs, no other reason |
|
|
|
|
domn8
Level 6 User
Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
|
Posted:
Tue Aug 02, 2005 12:56 pm |
|
I knew you'd say that Chris but I fancied a slightly lower look, would have still thought going lower would improve (decrease) body roll - waits for a slaughtering from C.H. |
|
|
|
|
Rich1
Level 7 User
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 224
|
Posted:
Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:23 pm |
|
body roll tbh is reduced by the poundage of the springs and the quality of damping properties of the shocks, uprated springs are a better way to go but are a lot more exensive i have found |
|
|
|
|
|