| Author |
Message |
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:40 am |
|
had them fitted yesterday ,needs to be lowered a bit me thinks
yes i know i have to get that fecking white strip on the rear door at some stage
 |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:46 am |
|
Don't like it, they look too small
They look nice on 5's tho |
|
|
|
|
Addie
Site Subscriber
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 1141
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:24 am |
|
You need the 16" 182's to look decent IMO, what was wrong with your PH1's? |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:32 am |
|
| Addie wrote: |
| You need the 16" 182's to look decent IMO, what was wrong with your PH1's? |
you are on about the multispoke ones ???? i like them wheels but 16" tyres are not so cheap as i heard.
nothing wrong with the ph1 alloys ,the are still as spanking as they were after the refurb ,just wanted a different look as i had these wheels hanging around |
|
|
|
|
simonds1
Site Subscriber
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 1108
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:53 am |
|
I think they look alright schaks. Would look better if you lowered the car tho, and got rid of the stripe like you said
Now that's what I'm talkin about  |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 8:27 am |
|
ayee ,cheers simonds
that looks ace mate , will deffo have to lower the beast regardless of the cost |
|
|
|
|
simonds1
Site Subscriber
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 1108
|
| Posted:
Sun Nov 13, 2005 8:41 am |
|
My lowering is probably really inaccurate tho! The actual car won't neccesarily look like that lol |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:44 am |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:55 am |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:52 am |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:53 am |
|
| Chris H wrote: |
| thats look shit! |
cheers |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:54 am |
|
looks loads higher on them as well |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:57 am |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:02 am |
|
| Chris H wrote: |
| looks loads higher on them as well |
thinking of lowering a wee bit |
|
|
|
|
Neal
Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:26 am |
|
| Chet T16 wrote: |
| Looks like a 1.4 |
LOL, quality!  |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:47 am |
|
now i really dot want to make a comment about what your car looks like neil , cause i am afraid you will start crying
and chet ,you are the last person to comment about a car"s looks, looking at the general lee and all  |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:00 am |
|
It was only a ph1 |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:52 am |
|
| Chris H wrote: |
| looks loads higher on them as well |
hang on a minute ,its on non 16v struts at the moment 
should drop it a little with the 16v ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
