 |
|
| Hello, you are currently browsing to Retro-Renault Archive which is a copy of our old forum. You cannot post replies in this forum. Please click here to go to the active website.
|
| Author |
Message |
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:43 pm |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:00 pm |
|
it still is a clio though
disclaimer : sorry for the inconvenince caused to any clito owners |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:05 pm |
|
I dont understand, whats bad points has the clio got? just out of interest... |
|
|
|
|
schakal
Spammer
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 5717
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:16 pm |
|
only joking mate 
its meant to be faster than a 19 16v |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:04 am |
|
have you ever been in a clio 16V? have you ever been in a 19 16V?
If no then go in one it will be answered straight away.
Clio is probably beaten by a mk3 fiesta on the winterior tbh and a 19 is a fraster car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |