Retro-Renault Archive Forum Index  
SEARCH THE ARCHIVE FORUMS  •  Log in
Hello, you are currently browsing to Retro-Renault Archive which is a copy of our old forum. You cannot post replies in this forum. Please click here to go to the active website. 
 chris or anyone help
Author Message
Soneji
Forum Moderator

Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 1356

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:15 am

more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better
bbracer16valver
Retroholic

Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3315

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:47 am

http://youtube.com/watch?v=f5GcgqbWNwg&mode=related&search=acceleration
Soneji
Forum Moderator

Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 1356

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:49 am

cheers man already have that but thats not really a 0-60 is it?
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber

Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:44 am

http://youtube.com/watch?v=OQHc13gqyh4&mode=related&search=acceleration
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager

Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:53 am

lol i dont think u guys get it

he wants a vid of a r19 16v doing 0 - 60mph

in other words, a camera showing the speedo whilst the car goes from rest to 60mph.

i've been looking for mine that i posted on here about 18 months ago which shows my dash from rest to 130mph but i canne find it Sad
bbracer16valver
Retroholic

Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3315

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:06 am

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8787688453797889848&q=renault+19

thas mine its like from 25-30 - 60 in 4-5secs on that video was ment to be a 0-60 run but aint the best lol

excuse for more hummmmmmmmm.....??? Rolling Eyes
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager

Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:15 am

i dont have that excuse, i would go out and do a video now of mine but . . my speedo does not work lol
bbracer16valver
Retroholic

Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3315

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:23 am

Laughing lol wounded
Evo
Level 4 User

Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Posts: 89

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:51 am

Soneji";p="102216 wrote:
more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better


Didn't mean to start an argument about that, I was just telling them about my 197 drive Smile

I know it does 0-60 in low 7s.
Soneji
Forum Moderator

Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 1356

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:15 am

Evo";p="102235 wrote:

Soneji";p="102216 wrote:
more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better


Didn't mean to start an argument about that, I was just telling them about my 197 drive Smile

I know it does 0-60 in low 7s.


lol its not your fault man, just people not listening to reason... you could put your 2 cents in being the OP and confirm my 'exagerations' of the 8.2 second 1916v
Peahole
Level 7 User

Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 243

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:22 pm

Is this a carry over from the thread on ocuk? Might have to finally register on there and put them straight.
Evo
Level 4 User

Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Posts: 89

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:35 pm

Soneji";p="102240 wrote:
Evo";p="102235 wrote:

Soneji";p="102216 wrote:
more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better


Didn't mean to start an argument about that, I was just telling them about my 197 drive Smile

I know it does 0-60 in low 7s.


lol its not your fault man, just people not listening to reason... you could put your 2 cents in being the OP and confirm my 'exagerations' of the 8.2 second 1916v


Already said I know it does it in low 7s on there Smile

I still want another 19, next year hopefully.
Chris H
Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:24 am

problem is autocar got one that done it in 8.5, a ph2 and wouldn't go over 125 mph, so crap like that doesn't help!
FincH
Site Subscriber

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 569

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:04 am

What've the nobs on OcUK been getting wrong now?
valver
Level 9 User

Joined: 07 Dec 2005
Posts: 373

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:41 am

whats ocuk?can someone give me a link to the thread?
Peahole
Level 7 User

Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 243

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:14 am

valver";p="102297 wrote:
whats ocuk?can someone give me a link to the thread?


Its a computer hardware site, has its own "motors" section.

Linky:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17603763

*edit* If you dislike the modeo whatever you do dont tell on there, you will never hear the end of it.
FincH
Site Subscriber

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 569

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:28 pm

For once I actualy agree with what most of them are saying on OcuK.

But seeing as I got banned and most of them are wankers, I won't continue the argument over here Smile
R1916S
Site Subscriber

Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 502

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:42 pm

Bullshit.

It's how it corner's
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager

Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:34 pm

Hmmmm interesting thread on OC.

There are so many variables that need to be considered thou, even with a standard non modified car when comparing 0-60 times.

no two cars are exactly alike even from new, you could get two brand new ph1 16V's off the factory floor and they would both put in different 0-60 times, then there is the weather, the track/road conditions, the driver, how much fuel its got on board, the octane rating etc etc.

0-60 times by manufactors are a guide and must only be considered as just that, a guide!
Peahole
Level 7 User

Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 243

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:36 pm

Quote:
Ive got a Clio 16v with the same engine, the williams 2.0 as standard will only hit 136mph at full tilt from the factory. It might show 140mph indicated but it wont be going that fast.


Hes trying so hard to know things, shame the ratios are different on the williams and its got a lower rev limit Rolling Eyes
FincH
Site Subscriber

Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 569

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:46 pm

Peahole";p="102311 wrote:
Quote:
Ive got a Clio 16v with the same engine, the williams 2.0 as standard will only hit 136mph at full tilt from the factory. It might show 140mph indicated but it wont be going that fast.


Hes trying so hard to know things, shame the ratios are different on the williams and its got a lower rev limit Rolling Eyes


I think the pint he is mkaing is that a Clio Williams can only reach 136Mph 'factory' speed. So a R19 16v might show 140 on the clock but is probably closer to 125Mph.

Also, you're comparing two factors, 0-60 and top speed. Ok, important factors but they don't really 'make' a car, unless of course you're a kev who likes to show off 0-60 and 100+ Mph stunts to his neddy mates.

Would much rather have a car that handles and peforms in the corners etc
Display posts from previous:      


 Jump to:   




SPIDER ARCHIVE
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group :: FI Theme :: All times are GMT - 7 Hours